The APA Hawai`i Chapter is pleased to welcome nominations for the 2008 Chapter Awards Program. The annual awards are given to recognize individuals, communities, private organizations, public agencies, and professional planning and design firms whose work exemplifies the planning profession’s highest goals and ideals. The awards program further serves to raise public awareness of the benefits of good planning by showcasing significant contributions that planning practitioners, professionals and community groups make to the State of Hawaii. A nomination form and description of award categories is attached. The deadline for nominations is June 13, 2008.
A $35 nomination fee is required for each award category entered. Late nominations will be accepted until June 27, 2008 with a late nomination fee of $50. Subject to the award jury deliberations, award winners are expected to be announced by August 29, 2008. Award winners will also receive commemorative plaques and be publicly recognized at the 2008 Hawai`i Congress of Planning Officials (HCPO) annual conference being held on the Island of Maui on September 10-12, 2008.
If you have any questions, please contact the Chapter Awards Coordinator: Steve Lettau at 599-7941. Mail or deliver applications and supporting material to:
Steve Lettau, APA-Hawaii Chapter Awards Coordinator
c/o Onyx Group
1001 Bishop Street, ASB Tower Suite 1555, Honolulu, HI 96813
Tel: 808-599-7941, slettau@onyxgroup.com
| AWARD CATEGORIES |
Community Advocacy Planning |
Recognizes a project, group, or individual that demonstrates a commitment to advocacy planning in support of society’s less fortunate members. |
Community-Based Planning |
Recognizes a citizen-based and initiated planning effort that establishes and enhances a sense of awareness of a community’s character, values, and aspirations. |
CURRENT TOPIC AWARD: Innovation in Regional Planning |
Recognizes innovative plans, programs, tools, or related efforts that demonstrate advancement in
planners' efforts to address the issues of planning at a regional, multi-jurisdictional level. This award
category is part of APA's larger effort to call attention to the need for regional planning and to promote
national and state policies providing legal and financial incentives for community cooperation. |
Distinguished Leadership |
Recognizes an individual’s personal efforts and contributions to the advancement of good planning in Hawaii. |
Distinguished Service |
Recognizes an individual for his/her service and support of the Chapter. |
Donald Wolbrink
Chapter Achievement |
Recognizes an individual, firm, or organization for exemplary related activity(ies) which warrant special recognition by the Chapter. |
Environment / Preservation |
Recognizes planning work done to nurture, perpetuate, or enhance the environment or the preservation of an area’s historic, and/or cultural resources. |
Media |
Recognizes a media organization or individual for contributions to promote good planning in Hawaii in the past year. |
Outstanding Planning |
Recognizes a project, process, or program that exemplifies excellence in planning. |
Public Education |
Recognizes an individual, project, or program that has informed or educated the public, or a segment of the public about the benefits of planning and/or how planning works. |
Student Project |
Recognizes a student or group of students in an accredited planning program for an outstanding class project. |
EVALUATION CRITERIA
The following general criteria will be used to evaluate each project or individual nominated. Evaluation criteria for the Current Topic Award is to be announced. |
Innovation |
Originality of concept or appreciable refinement of existing techniques or procedures.
How does the nominated effort present a visionary approach or innovative concept within the context of the jurisdiction’s situation? To What extent has the initiative been used to address the need identified in the nomination? How has the use of the planning process in this context expanded upon accepted planning principles? |
Transferability |
Potential application in other areas or to other projects.
How does the nominated effort provide a potential application to others? To what extent would broader application of this effort’s components and methodology further the cause of good planning? |
Quality |
Excellence of thought, analysis, writing, graphics, and character of presentation.
To what extent does the nominated effort show excellence of thought, analysis, writing, graphics and the application of ethical planning principles? How were available resources used in well-conceived and appropriate format? |
Implementation |
Plans were carried out successfully or they show promise of being implemented. How has the submission addressed the need or problem that prompted its initiation? How have these results made a difference in the lives of the people affected? How effective is it in short, medium, and long terms? |
Comprehensiveness |
Planning principles were observed, especially their effects on other public objectives.
How have planning principles been observed, especially in consideration of the nominated effort’s effects on other public objectives? To what extent does the effort include elements important to the local community? |
|